Hi everyone,

I first came across artificial selection at a young age through my love of dogs and my constant questions on why that puppy had spots, or long hair, or how come it was a guide dog etc. In highschool I was introduced to genetic inheritance along with evolution which sparked my interest in science, in particular Zoology, Ecology & Conservation. Now here I am as an undergrad and I hope to introduce you to the topic I find most riveting: Domestication. I shall endeavor to cover all areas, from agriculture and livestock species selected for human benefit to species bred purely for aesthetic enjoyment such as ornamental plants and pets, along with any scientific processes or ethical debates that arise along the way.

enjoy!

‘Domestication is an evolutionary process of species divergence in which morphological and physiological changes result from the cultivation/tending of plant or animal species by a mutualistic partner, most prominently humans.’ (Purugganan & Fuller, 2010)

Thursday, 24 April 2014

Differences in Guinea Pig Behaviour: Wild vs Domestic



Domestic guinea pig (Cavia porcellus)
Guinea pigs (Cavia aperea f. porcellus) originated in the highlands of South America where they were domesticated from wild cavies (Cavia aperea) approx. 3000-6000 years ago for food. During domestication there was a tremendous increase in population densities. While cavies live in large home ranges (200m2 – 1000m2) guinea pigs can be kept in groups of up to 20 individuals in 6m2 enclosures without any problems.  

Domestication removes some pressures of natural selection and replaces them with new selection pressures created from an artificial environment. This, along with direct artificial selection by humans can result in marked alterations in the biobehavioural profile of a species. These profiles are also influenced by heritage and an ontogeny phase: adolescence; which is the gradual transition from infancy through stages resulting in sexually mature adults. During adolescence there is an extensive alteration in anatomy, endocrine systems, neural circuits and behaviour. This is especially important in the development of guinea pigs as development is heavily influenced by the social circumstances the individual is exposed to during adolescence.  

Zipser et al (2014) analysed differences in emotional and social behaviours and cortisol reactivity across adolescent male guinea pigs and cavies. Major differences in behavioural and endocrinological parameters were found. Young individuals show that adaptations that reflect the differences between the natural habitat of cavies and manmade housing conditions guinea pigs emerge early in ontogeny well before attainment of sexual maturity.

Differences in emotional behaviour found cavies to be more explorative, risk-taking and socially less active. From an evolutionary standpoint, extensive exploration is crucial for wild animals in order to obtain access to vital recourses such as water, food, shelter and mates. Cavies also consistently showed higher cortisol reactivity. In highly demanding circumstances energy is expensive, therefore appropriate physiological adaptations to provide the necessary energy quickly is required. High cortisol reactivity can be interpreted as the energy provisioning mechanism that meets these demands.

In contrast, the biobehavioural profile of guinea pigs is characterised by higher levels of social activity and lower levels of risk-taking, exploration and cortisol reactivity. They are more social interactive with lower cortisol reactivity levels than cavies as they are adapted to a less challenging environment with much higher population densities. Higher degrees of agreeableness, sexual behaviour and lower levels of aggression are common in domestication as dangerous and challenging environmental factors (hence selection pressures) are removed, such as in manmade housing systems which provide all relative resources for guinea pigs to thrive. 

image accessed 25/04/2014: http://www.vetwest.com.au/pet-library/guinea-pig-care
 

2 comments:

  1. This is an interesting study. What methods did they use to test emotion, social behaviour and cortisol reactivity? How did they quantify risk-taking behaviour?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Tasmin,
    Emotionality: there were three types of tests:
    -Open field test: how long they stayed stationary on starting point in the open (anxiety like behaviour) and how far they travelled in the open (explorative behaviour). Dark light test: how long they stayed within the enclosed dark box (anxiety like behaviour) and the time taken to emerge into the open (explorative behaviour). Step down test: tested risk-taking behaviour by time taken to jump from an elevated platform.
    Social Behaviour: there were two types of tests; male vs. unfamiliar infant interaction test & male vs. unfamiliar female courtship test where both male cavies and male guinea pigs had a choice between an empty control cage and the one with the stranger in it.
    Cortisol Reactivity: tested elevation of plasma cortisol titres using a stress reactivity test; comparing initial Cortisol levels when in a familiar home, then transferring them to a strange unfamiliar environment and again testing the cortisol reaction (level of stress).
    Generally, this experiment involved a lot of observation and video-recordings (as to ensure human presence didn’t influence either species). The methods are proven successful from previous studies and were based on tests commonly used to characterise behaviour in mice and rats that have now been adapted for guinea pigs and cavies.

    ReplyDelete