Hi everyone,

I first came across artificial selection at a young age through my love of dogs and my constant questions on why that puppy had spots, or long hair, or how come it was a guide dog etc. In highschool I was introduced to genetic inheritance along with evolution which sparked my interest in science, in particular Zoology, Ecology & Conservation. Now here I am as an undergrad and I hope to introduce you to the topic I find most riveting: Domestication. I shall endeavor to cover all areas, from agriculture and livestock species selected for human benefit to species bred purely for aesthetic enjoyment such as ornamental plants and pets, along with any scientific processes or ethical debates that arise along the way.

enjoy!

‘Domestication is an evolutionary process of species divergence in which morphological and physiological changes result from the cultivation/tending of plant or animal species by a mutualistic partner, most prominently humans.’ (Purugganan & Fuller, 2010)

Thursday 13 March 2014

Pigeon Domestication: Was It Worth It?





One of the most famous examples of domestication is Darwin and his pigeons (Freeman et. al., 2007). Darwin held much interest in the artificial selection of pigeons with elaborately shaped and coloured feathers to support his research into evolution. The domestic pigeon (Columba livia), originated 5000 years ago from Mediterranean rock doves. They were domesticated for food, fancy looks and pigeon racing. At around 350 domestic breeds there is enormous variation in size, shape, and colour. 
http://charlesdarwintrust.org/content/86/galleries_pigeons
Fancy Pigeon Photo courtsey of John Ross. http://charlesdarwintrust.org/content/86/galleries_pigeons  

Now a new generation of feral pigeons (domestic breeds released/escaped into the wild) inhabit cities around the world (Cookson, 2013). Sol (2008) examined the outcome of pigeon domestication and its flow on effects that hinder survival to its feral descendant’s populations. Artificial selection is known to displace individuals from their ‘adaptive peak’ that enhances species survival in the wild. This can be seen in the disproportionally long tarsus-metatarsus bones (leg bone) in the domestic and feral pigeon. The size of the leg bone is hereditary and influential in how an animal utilizes its environment (stride length, speed and perching stability).

 It was found that longer leg bones are a hindrance and resulted in higher mortality in feral pigeons due to inefficient locomotion required in active food searching. Surprisingly, instead of the demise of the feral pigeon, it appears re-adaption has occurred independently with feral pigeon populations reverting back to their ancestral rock dove skeletal sizes and shapes, steering away from their most direct domestic ancestors. This suggests that selective pressures of the wild environment (a phenotype–ecology association) has driven natural selection to ‘undo’ domestication and assert the size and shape phenotypes of the original, wild ancestors.


Is human interference in the evolution of species through domestication beneficial or detrimental?

As seen in the domestic pigeon, the traits selected for that are deemed ‘fit’ & ‘better’ in reality no longer allow for the species to successfully function in its native ecosystem from whence it originated. 

Will feral pigeons ever fully revert back to their ancestral physiology?

Some populations may not have had enough time yet to re-adapt OR possibly a new niche in human-made habitats has created a unique morphological optimum for feral pigeons, rather than their ancestors open rocky environment. 

Thanks to humans it could be implied that the feral pigeons (often called ‘flying rats’) presence in cities is solely “our” fault. 

5 comments:

  1. That's interesting how the pigeons are able to re-adapt to their ancestral skeletal sizes and shapes. Did it say how the longer leg bones benefited the domesticated pigeons in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Courtney, I couldn't find exactly why they were selected for long legs but I believe it is a combination of appearance (for winning breeding shows etc) as well as the fact that as they were domesticated to be kept in cages. Caged pigeons didn't need to walk extensively on the ground to find food but rather to perch and wait for humans, and staying stationary in a perched position led to longer legs (stability etc). I hope that helps! Google images of fancy pigeons and the wide range of appearance is amazing.

      Delete
  2. Nice post! I like that you’ve used a classic example of artificial selection here and that you’ve explained it quite eloquently. This is a good example of how natural selection pressures are often very different to the selection pressures humans imposed on animals. Feral pigeons are amazingly successful birds, so I wonder what other types of adaptations could promote their continued success in human environments?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Tasmin, other than reverting back to their ancestral morphology I found that feral pigeons have two other adaptations that could explain their abundance in human environments. They have very unfussy nesting needs and use very rudimentary sites like window ledges & abandoned buildings as well as mass nesting/flocking tendencies. So they are not struggling to find shelter/keep warm. But most importantly I think it is their breeding habits that promote their success. Breeding is strongly dependent on food availability, and in cities food is abundant all year round therefore individuals can successfully reproduce up to six times a year. Its amazing : )

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete